iOS

05
Jun
2021
Fix ‘Xcode is not currently installed or could not be found’ error in Visual Studio 2019 for Mac

Fix ‘Xcode is not currently installed or could not be found’ error in Visual Studio 2019 for Mac

Every now and then, our IDE’s get some updates. This week, Visual Studio for MacOS got updated once again. After that, there was a separated Download initiated for the Xcode Command Line Tools. Two days later, Visual Studio started to greet me with this little message:

Xcode missing message VS Mac

Of course, I checked first that my installed version of Xcode is still working – it stopped already for me some time ago and I had to reinstall it. As you can see, that was not the case:

Xcode 12.5 about window

After doing some research on the web, others had similar issues. The problem was that the installation of the Xcode CLI tools has overridden the location of Xcode in Preferences – as you can see in the

The fix is easy, just paste /Applications/Xcode.app/ into the location field. Please note that the trailing slash is also important:

The dialog will immediately verify the existence of Xcode (at least in version 8.9.10). Just hit that restart button and you are once again good to go.

As always, I hope this short post will be helpful for some of you.

Until the next post – happy coding, everyone.

Posted by msicc in Dev Stories, iOS, Xamarin, 1 comment
15
Mar
2021
Extending Xamarin.Forms.Nuke on iOS to load a placeholder for images that fail to load

Extending Xamarin.Forms.Nuke on iOS to load a placeholder for images that fail to load

What is Xamarin.Forms.Nuke?

Xamarin.Forms.Nuke is a Xamarin.Forms implementation of Nuke, one of the most advanced image libraries on iOS today. The Xamarin.Forms implementation focuses heavily on caching only, while the original library has a bunch of more features. I learned about this library when I started to look for an alternative to cache images via Akavache which I used before (I never blogged about that part because it wasn’t ready for that, tbh).

Why do we need to extend the library?

The library currently does only one thing (pretty well) – handling the caching of web images. It uses the default settings of the native Nuke library. The Xamarin.Forms implementation overwrites the ImageSourceHandler for UriImageSource and FileImageSource (optionally), but the case of placeholder loading is not intended in the original version. As I have multiple scenarios where a placeholder comes in handy, I decided to extend the library – and maintain my own fork of it from now on. (Maybe there will be a pull request to the original source, too).

Show me some code, finally!

For our extension, we modify the FormsHandler class as well as the ImageSourceHandler class. Let’s have a look at the FormsHandler class first. We are adding a new property for the placeholder:

public static ImageSource PlaceholderImageSource { get; private set; }

With that property in place, let’s add two methods. One method is for loading a placeholder image from an embedded resource file, while the second one is for specifying a FontImageSource.

public static void PlaceholderFromResource(string resourceName, Assembly assembly) =>
    PlaceholderImageSource = ImageSource.FromResource(resourceName, assembly);

public static void PlaceholderFromFontImageSource(FontImageSource fontImageSource) =>
    PlaceholderImageSource = fontImageSource;

I have chosen the FormsHandler class because setting the placeholder is a global thing (in my scenarios, your mileage may vary). That’s already everything in takes in the FormsHandler class, so let’s have a look at the ImageSourceHandler class.

As we are using the default Xamarin.Forms ImageSourceHandler for the resource image (which is a StreamImageSource) and the FontImageSource, we need to add the static fields for them first:

private static readonly StreamImagesourceHandler DefaultStreamImageSourceHandler = new StreamImagesourceHandler();

private static readonly FontImageSourceHandler DefaultFontImageSourcehandler = new FontImageSourceHandler();

Now let’s implement the loading of the placeholder in a separate method:

private static Task<UIImage> LoadPlaceholderAsync()
{
    switch (FormsHandler.PlaceholderImageSource)
    {
        case StreamImageSource streamImageSource:
            FormsHandler.Warn($"loading placeholder from resource");
            return DefaultStreamImageSourceHandler.LoadImageAsync(streamImageSource);
                    
        case FontImageSource fontImageSource:
            FormsHandler.Warn($"loading placeholder from Font");
            return DefaultFontImageSourcehandler.LoadImageAsync(fontImageSource);
        default:
            FormsHandler.Warn($"no valid placeholder found");
            return null;
    }
}

As you can see, there is nothing overly complicated in this method. Based on the type of the placeholder set in the FormsHandler class, we are calling the default Xamarin.Forms implementation for the placeholder image. Let’s take this code into action by changing the LoadImageAsync method of the ImageSourceHandler:

public async Task<UIImage> LoadImageAsync(
    ImageSource imageSource,
    CancellationToken cancellationToken = new CancellationToken(),
    float scale = 1)
{
    var result = await NukeHelper.LoadViaNuke(imageSource, cancellationToken, scale);
    if (result == null)
        result = await LoadPlaceholderAsync();

    return result;
}

As we need to know if the Nukehelper class is able to load the image, we are already running the code by awaiting it at this level. If the result is null, we are loading the placeholder image via our prior implemented method. That’s all we need to do in our forked Xamarin.Forms.Nuke repository.

How to use it in your Xamarin.Forms – iOS project

First, clone my fork (or fork it if you want) of the Xamarin.Forms.Nuke repository and import it into your Xamarin.Forms solution and reference it in your iOS project. Once that is done, we need to initialize the Nuke library (like in the original source) in the AppDelegate‘s FinishedLaunching method:

Xamarin.Forms.Nuke.FormsHandler.Init(true, false);

The second step is to define the placeholder image source. The FontImageSource should be defined after the LoadApplication method. This way, you can the Xamarin.Forms way of loading the font as a resource.

//Resource image
Xamarin.Forms.Nuke.FormsHandler.PlaceholderFromResource("CachedImageTest.MSicc_Logo_Base_Blue_1024px_pad25.png", Assembly.GetAssembly(typeof(MainViewModel)));

//FontImageSource
Xamarin.Forms.Nuke.FormsHandler.PlaceholderFromFontImageSource(new FontImageSource
{
    Glyph = CachedImageTest.Resources.MaterialDesignIcons.ImageBroken,
    FontFamily = "MaterialDesignIcons",
    Color = Color.Red
});

Now use the Xamarin.Forms Image control like you always do. If the image from the web cannot be loaded, you will see the placeholder, like in these two examples:

cached image placeholder sample
Left: Single image failed loading, right image in CollectionView failed loading

With a few additions to the Xamarin.Forms.Nuke library, we have implemented a placeholder mechanism for images that can’t be loaded. As always, I hope this post will be useful for some of you. Now that I have the iOS implementation of a fast cached image with placeholder loading in place, I will turn to Android, where I will try to achieve the same using the Glidex.Forms library and extend it to load a placeholder. There will be a full sample once that is implemented as well. Stay tuned for that one!

Until the next post, happy coding, everyone!
Posted by msicc in Dev Stories, iOS, Xamarin, 2 comments
15
Mar
2020
Sending push notifications to your Xamarin app from WordPress with Azure, Part II – the Function

Sending push notifications to your Xamarin app from WordPress with Azure, Part II – the Function

First, let’s have a look at the lineup of this series once again:

  • Preparing your WordPress (blog/site)
  • Preparing the Azure Function and connect the Webhook (this post)
  • Preparing the Notification Hub
  • Send the notification to Android
  • Send the notification to iOS
  • Adding in Xamarin.Forms

Creating a new Azure Function in Visual Studio

The most simple approach to create a new Azure Function (if you already have an Azure account) is adding a new project to your Xamarin solution:

After the project is loaded, double click on the .csproj file in the Solution Explorer to open the file for editing it. Make sure you have the following two PropertyGroup entries:

  <PropertyGroup>
    <TargetFramework>net461</TargetFramework>
    <AzureFunctionsVersion>v1</AzureFunctionsVersion>
  </PropertyGroup>
  <ItemGroup>
    <!--DO NOT UPDATE THE AZURE PACKAGES, IT WILL BREAK EVERYTHING!!!!-->
    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Azure.NotificationHubs" Version="1.0.9" />
    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs.Extensions.NotificationHubs" Version="1.3.0" />
    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Functions" Version="1.0.31" />
    <PackageReference Include="Newtonsoft.Json" Version="9.0.1" />
  </ItemGroup>

You may notice that I made an all caps comment into the second PropertyGroup entry. As I am using a v1 Function, these are the latest packages that I am able to use. They are doing their job, and allow us to use an easy way to bind the Function to the Azure NotificationHub , which we are going to implement in the next post. I delayed updating the whole setup to use a v2 function intentionally at this point.

Processing the Webhook payload

In order to be able to process the payload (remember, we are getting a JSON string) from our WordPress Webhook, we need to deserialize it. Let’s create the class that holds all information about it:

using Newtonsoft.Json;

namespace NewPostHandler
{
    public class PublishedPostNotification
    {
        [JsonProperty("id")]
        [JsonConverter(typeof(StringToLongConverter))]
        public long Id { get; set; }

        [JsonProperty("title")]
        public string Title { get; set; }

        [JsonProperty("status")]
        public string Status { get; set; }

        [JsonProperty("featured_media")]
        public string FeaturedMedia { get; set; }
    }
}

The class gets it pretty straight forward, we will use this implementation as-is for the payload we are sending to Android later on. The use of the StringToLongConverter is optional. For completeness, here is the implementation:

using Newtonsoft.Json;
using System;

namespace NewPostHandler
{
    public class StringToLongConverter : JsonConverter
    {
        public override bool CanConvert(Type t) => t == typeof(long) || t == typeof(long?);

        public override object ReadJson(JsonReader reader, Type t, object existingValue, JsonSerializer serializer)
        {
            if (reader.TokenType == JsonToken.Null) return default(long);
            var value = serializer.Deserialize<string>(reader);
            if (long.TryParse(value, out var l))
            {
                return l;
            }

            return default(long);
        }

        public override void WriteJson(JsonWriter writer, object untypedValue, JsonSerializer serializer)
        {
            if (untypedValue == null)
            {
                serializer.Serialize(writer, null);
                return;
            }
            var value = (long)untypedValue;
            serializer.Serialize(writer, value.ToString());
            return;
        }

        public static readonly StringToLongConverter Instance = new StringToLongConverter();
    }
}

Now that we prepared our data transferring object, it is time to finally have a look at the processor code.

[FunctionName("HandleNewPostHook")]
public static async Task<HttpResponseMessage> Run([HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Function, "post", Route = null)]HttpRequestMessage req, TraceWriter log)
{
    _log = log;
    _log.Info("arrived at 'HandleNewPostHook' function trigger.");

    //ignoring any query parameters, only using POST body

    PublishedPostNotification result = null;

    try
    {
        _jsonSerializerSettings = new JsonSerializerSettings()
        {
            MetadataPropertyHandling = MetadataPropertyHandling.Ignore,
            DateParseHandling = DateParseHandling.None,
            Converters =
            {
                new IsoDateTimeConverter { DateTimeStyles = DateTimeStyles.AssumeUniversal },
                StringToLongConverter.Instance
            }
        };

        _jsonSerializer = JsonSerializer.Create(_jsonSerializerSettings);

        using (var stream = await req.Content.ReadAsStreamAsync())
        {
            using (var reader = new StreamReader(stream))
            {
                using (var jsonReader = new JsonTextReader(reader))
                {
                    result = _jsonSerializer.Deserialize<PublishedPostNotification>(jsonReader);
                }
            }
        }

        if (result == null)
        {
            _log.Error("There was an error processing the request (serialization result is NULL)");
            return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, "There was an error processing the post body");
        }

       //subject of the next post
      //await TriggerPushNotificationAsync(result);
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        _log.Error("There was an error processing the request", ex);
        return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, "There was an error processing the post body");
    }

    if (result.Id != default)
    {
        _log.Info($"initiated processing of published post with id {result.Id}");
        return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK, "Processing new published post...");
    }
    else
    {
        _log.Error("There was an error processing the request (cannot process result Id with default value)");
        return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, "There was an error processing (postId not valid)");
    }
}

Let’s go through the code. The first thing I want to know is if we ever enter the Function, so I log the entrance. The second step is setting up the JsonSerializer to deserialize the payload into the DTO class I created before.

There are several scenarios that I am handling and returning different responses. Ideally, we would run through and arrive at the TriggerPushNotificationAsync call, followed by a jump the ‘OK‘- response if the post id received from our Webhook is valid. During testing, however, I ran into other situations as well, where I return a ‘Bad Request‘ response with a hint that something went wrong.

The implementation of the TriggerPushNotificationAsync method is not shown in this post as it will be subject of the next post in this series.

Testing the code locally

One of the reasons I chose to start the Function in Visual Studio is its ability to debug it locally. If you don’t have the necessary tools installed, Visual Studio will prompt you to do so. After installing them, you’ll be able to follow along.

Once the service is running, we will be able to test our function. If you haven’t already heard about it, Postman will be the easiest tool for that. Copy the function url and paste it into the url field in Postman. Next, add a sample JSON payload to the body (settings: raw, JSON) and hit the ‘Send’ button:

If all goes well, Postman will give you a success response:

The Azure CLI will also write some output:

As you can see, all of our log entries were written to the CLI, plus some additional information from Azure itself. Don’t worry for the moment about the anonymous authorization state, this is just because we are running locally. In theory, we could already publish the function to Azure now. As we know that we will extend the Function in the next post, however, we will not do this right now.

Conclusion

As you can see, writing an Azure Function isn’t as complicated as it sounds. Visual Studio brings all the tools you need to get started pretty fast. The ability to test the Function code locally is another big advantage that comes with Visual Studio.

In the next post, we will configure the NotificationHub on Azure and extend our Function to call into it and fire the notifications.

Until the next post, happy coding, everyone!
Posted by msicc in Android, Azure, Dev Stories, iOS, Xamarin, 1 comment
29
Feb
2020
Sending push notifications to your Xamarin app from WordPress with Azure, Part I [new series]

Sending push notifications to your Xamarin app from WordPress with Azure, Part I [new series]

Overview

Choosing the “right” solution for sending push notifications isn’t easy if you have a WordPress blog. There are quite a bunch of options to choose from, and the right one for you might differ from my decision. I am using the most generic solution – a Webhook that triggers an Azure Function, which triggers the notification via Azure Notification Hubs. This series will grow as follows:

  • Preparing your WordPress (blog/site) (this post)
  • Preparing the Azure Function and connect the Webhook
  • Preparing the Notification Hub
  • Send the notification to Android
  • Send the notification to iOS
  • Adding in Xamarin.Forms

The app implementations are very platform-specific, but it is quite easy to integrate the post notifications in a Xamarin.Forms app (which will be the last post in this series). If you want to see the whole integration already in action, feel free to download my blog reader app:

MSicc’s Blog version 1.6.0 out now for Android and iOS

WordPress plugins for the win

If you have a self-hosted blog like I do, you may know that the plugin ecosystem is there to help you with a lot of things that WordPress hasn’t out of the box. While a WordPress-hosted site as Webhook integration without an additional plugin, we need one to create such a Webhook on a self-hosted WordPress blog. The plugin I am using is simply called “Notification” and can be found here.

To install the plugin, follow these simple steps:

  • choose “Plugins” on your WordPress dashboard
  • select “Add New” and type in “notification”
  • Hit the “Install Now” button
  • Activate the plugin

Exploring the options

Once you have installed and activated the plugin, you will have a new option in the dashboard menu. Let’s have a look at the options.

  • Notifications – this shows you a list of your currently active notifications
  • Add New Notification – lets you create a new notification
  • Extensions – the plugin allows you to extend your notifications with external services like Slack, Twitter or SendGrid to engage even more users. We do not need these for the webhook, however.
  • Settings – the control panel for the plugin – this is where we will be for the rest of this blog

Enabling the Webhook

On the Settings page, select the “CARRIERS” option. The plugin uses so-called carriers to send out the notifications. By default, the Email carrier is active. I do not need this one for the moment, so I deactivated it an activated the Webhook carrier instead:

Setting Post Triggers

The next step is to verify we have the trigger for posts active:

You can modify the other triggers as well, but for the moment, I am focusing just on posts. I am thinking about integrating comments in the future, which will allow even more interaction from within my app.

Add a new notification

Let’s create our first notification. Select the “Add New Notification” action, which will bring up this page:

Select the “Add New Carrier” option and add the Webhook carrier:

Next, select the Trigger for the Webhook. During development, I am using the saving draft option as it allows me to easily trigger a notification without annoying anyone:

This will enable the “Merge Tags” list on the right-hand side. To create the Webhook payload, we need to add some arguments (using the “Add argument” button). Tip: you can copy the merge tag by just clicking on it and paste it into the “Value” box:

Don’t forget to activate the JSON format – we do not want it to be sent as XML. Make sure the Carrier is enabled and hit the save button on the upper right.

Testing the Webhook

Now that we finished the setup of our Webhook, let’s test it. To do so, go to the “Settings” page again and select “DEBUGGING”. Check the “Enable Notification logging” box and click the “Save Changes” button:

To test the notification, just create a new blog post and save the draft. Go back to the “DEBUGGING” setting, where you will be presented a new Notification log entry. Expanding this log entry, you will see some common data about the notification:

If you scroll a bit further down, you will see the payload of the Webhook. Sadly, you won’t get the raw JSON string, but a structured overview of the payload:

Verify that the payload contains all the data you need and adjust the settings if necessary. Once that is done, we are ready to go to the next blog post (coming soon).

Conclusion

In this post, I showed you how to create a Webhook that will trigger our upcoming Azure Function. Thanks to the “Notification” plugin, the process is pretty straight forward. In the next post, we will have a look at the Azure Function that will handle the Webhook.

Until the next post, happy coding, everyone!

Posted by msicc in Android, Azure, Dev Stories, iOS, Xamarin, 1 comment
14
Feb
2020
MSicc’s Blog version 1.6.0 out now for Android and iOS

MSicc’s Blog version 1.6.0 out now for Android and iOS

Here are the new features:

Push Notifications

With version 1.6.0 of the app, you can opt-in to receive push notifications once I publish a new blog post. I use an Azure Function (v1, for the ease of bindings – at least for now), and of course, an Azure NotificationHub. The Function gets called from a WebHook (via a plugin on WordPress), which triggers it to run (the next blog posts I write will be about how I achieved this, btw.)

New Design using Xamarin.Forms Shell

I also overhauled the design of the application. Initially, it was a MasterDetail app, but I never felt happy with that. Using Xamarin.Forms.Shell, I optimized the app to only show the last 30 posts I wrote. If you need older articles, you’ll be able to search for them within the app. The new design is a “v1” and will be constantly improved along with new features.

Bugs fixed in this release
  • fixed a bug where code snippets were not correctly displayed
  • fixed a bug where the app did not refresh posts after cleaning the cache
  • other minor fixes and improvements

I hope some of you will use the application and give me some feedback.

You can download the app using these links:
iOS | Android

Until the next post, happy coding, everyone!

Posted by msicc in Android, Azure, Dev Stories, iOS, Xamarin, 0 comments
17
Jan
2020
#XfEffects: Forms Effect to automatically scale FontSize on Label

#XfEffects: Forms Effect to automatically scale FontSize on Label

Why do I need this?

When working with text, we often have to deal with some or all of the following:

  • dynamic text with different length on every instance
  • multiple devices with different screen resolutions
  • limited number of lines

As the amount of places where I need to automatically scale the FontSize is steadily increasing within my apps, I had to come up with a solution – the AutoFitFontSizeEffect.

The shared code

Of course, every Effect has a shared code part. Like in my first post, there are two classes for this – the Effect wrapper and the static parameter class on top of it. The wrapper is pretty straight forward:

    public class AutoFitFontSizeEffect : RoutingEffect
    {
        #region Protected Constructors

        public AutoFitFontSizeEffect() : base($"XfEffects.{nameof(AutoFitFontSizeEffect)}")
        {
        }

        #endregion Protected Constructors
    }

Like with all effects, we are deriving from RoutingEffect and initializing the class with the effect’s id. As I wanted the effect to be configurable with a minimum and a maximum size, I added a static class that takes these two parameters:

    public static class AutoFitFontSizeEffectParameters
    {
        #region Public Fields

        public static BindableProperty MaxFontSizeProperty = BindableProperty.CreateAttached("MaxFontSize", typeof(NamedSize), typeof(AutoFitFontSizeEffectParameters), NamedSize.Large, BindingMode.Default);
        public static BindableProperty MinFontSizeProperty = BindableProperty.CreateAttached("MinFontSize", typeof(NamedSize), typeof(AutoFitFontSizeEffectParameters), NamedSize.Default, BindingMode.Default);

        #endregion Public Fields

        #region Public Methods

        public static NamedSize GetMaxFontSize(BindableObject bindable)
        {
            return (NamedSize)bindable.GetValue(MaxFontSizeProperty);
        }

        public static NamedSize GetMinFontSize(BindableObject bindable)
        {
            return (NamedSize)bindable.GetValue(MinFontSizeProperty);
        }

        public static double MaxFontSizeNumeric(BindableObject bindable)
        {
            return Device.GetNamedSize(GetMaxFontSize(bindable), typeof(Label));
        }

        public static double MinFontSizeNumeric(BindableObject bindable)
        {
            return Device.GetNamedSize(GetMinFontSize(bindable), typeof(Label));
        }

        public static void SetMaxFontSize(BindableObject bindable, NamedSize value)
        {
            bindable.SetValue(MaxFontSizeProperty, value);
        }

        public static void SetMinFontSize(BindableObject bindable, NamedSize value)
        {
            bindable.SetValue(MinFontSizeProperty, value);
        }

        #endregion Public Methods
    }

Let’s break that class down. First, I created two attached BindableProperty objects of type NamedSize. The NamedSize enumeration makes it easy for us to determine the minimum and maximum sizes. If you want to know the values behind the enum entries, check this table in the docs.

To get and set those values out of the BindableProperty, I implemented corresponding methods. As we will see later on, I implemented also two methods that get the numeric values, which will be used in our platform-specific implementations.

Android implementation

Android has a built-in method on TextView to achieve the auto-scaling functionality we desire (read more about it on the Android docs). This makes the implementation pretty straight forward:

    public class AutoFitFontSizeEffect : PlatformEffect
    {
        #region Protected Methods

        protected override void OnAttached()
        {
            if (this.Control is TextView textView)
            {
                if (AutoFitFontSizeEffectParameters.GetMinFontSize(this.Element) == NamedSize.Default &&
                    AutoFitFontSizeEffectParameters.GetMaxFontSize(this.Element) == NamedSize.Default)
                    return;

                var min = (int)AutoFitFontSizeEffectParameters.MinFontSizeNumeric(this.Element);
                var max = (int)AutoFitFontSizeEffectParameters.MaxFontSizeNumeric(this.Element);

                if (max <= min)
                    return;

                textView.SetAutoSizeTextTypeUniformWithConfiguration(min, max, 1, (int)ComplexUnitType.Sp);
            }
        }

        protected override void OnDetached()
        {
        }

        #endregion Protected Methods
    }

Before using the SetAutoSizeTextTypeUniformWithConfiguration method on the TextView, I am running two checks: one if both parameters are set to NamedSize.Default, and the other one if the minimum value is bigger than the maximum value. If we pass past these check, we are using the above mentioned method. That is already everything it needs to make the text scaling automatically within the bounds of the TextView on Android.

iOS implementation

Like Android, also iOS has a pretty easy way to automatically scale the FontSize:

    public class AutoFitFontSizeEffect : PlatformEffect
    {
        #region Protected Methods

        protected override void OnAttached()
        {
            if (this.Control is UILabel label)
            {
                if (AutoFitFontSizeEffectParameters.GetMinFontSize(this.Element) == NamedSize.Default &&
                    AutoFitFontSizeEffectParameters.GetMaxFontSize(this.Element) == NamedSize.Default)
                    return;

                var min = (int)AutoFitFontSizeEffectParameters.MinFontSizeNumeric(this.Element);
                var max = (int)AutoFitFontSizeEffectParameters.MaxFontSizeNumeric(this.Element);

                if (max <= min)
                    return;

                label.AdjustsFontSizeToFitWidth = true;
                label.MinimumFontSize = (float)min;
                label.Font = label.Font.WithSize((float)max);
            }
        }

        protected override void OnDetached()
        {
        }

        #endregion Protected Methods
    }

We are running the same checks as on Android before we are effectively changing the properties on the UILabel that will make the text scale automatically. With setting AdjustsFontSizeToFitWidth to true and setting the MinimumFontSize to our min value as well as the max value as FontSize, we have already done everything it needs on iOS.

Conclusion

The checks we run before using the codes are not random. It may happen that you only add the effect to your Xamarin.Forms.Label without setting the MinFontSize and MaxFontSize. In this case, I am just returning.

Besides mixing up the sizes, the main reason for the second check is that the platform-specific size values are different between platforms. Also in this case, I am just returning.

Besides that, we are able to use all other properties of the default Xamarin.Forms.Label implementation, with MaxLines and LineBreakMode being the two most important ones.

As always, I hope this post will be helpful for some of you. Of course, the sample project for this series is updated on GitHub.

Happy coding, everyone!

Posted by msicc in Android, Dev Stories, iOS, Xamarin, 3 comments
17
Sep
2019
[Updated] #XfEffects: Xamarin.Forms Effect to change the TintColor of ImageButton’s image – (new series)

[Updated] #XfEffects: Xamarin.Forms Effect to change the TintColor of ImageButton’s image – (new series)

The documentation recommends using Effects when we just want to change properties on the underlying native control. I have begun to love Effects as they make my code more readable. With Effects, I always know that there is a platform-specific implementation attached, while that is not obvious when using a custom renderer. Nowadays, I always try to implement an Effect before a Renderer.

Update: I updated the sample project to also respect changes in the ImageButton‘s source. I recently ran into the situation to change the Source (Play/Pause) via my ViewModel based on its state and realized that the effect needs to be reapplied in this case. Please be aware.

The basics

Effects work in a similar way to Renderers. You implement the definition in the Xamarin.Forms project, which attaches it to the control that needs the change. The PlatformEffect implementation needs to be exported to be compiled into the application. Like in a Renderer, the platform implementation also supports property changes. In this new series #XfEffects, I am going to show you some Effects that have been useful for me.

Effect declaration

Let’s turn over to this post’s Effect. We will change the TintColor of an ImageButton to our needs. Let’s start with creating the class for our Effect:

    public class ImageButtonTintEffect : RoutingEffect
    {
        public ImageButtonTintEffect() : base($"XfEffects.{nameof(ImageButtonTintEffect)}")
        {
        }
    }

All Xamarin.Forms Effect implementations need to derive from the RoutingEffect class and pass the Effect‘s name to the base class’ constructor. That’s pretty much everything we have to do for the Effect class itself.

Effect extension for passing parameters

The easiest way for us to get our desired TintColor to the platform implementation is an attached BindableProperty. To be able to attach the BindableProperty, we need a static class that provides the container for the attached property:

public static class ImageButtonTintEffectExtensions
{
    public static readonly BindableProperty TintColorProperty = BindableProperty.CreateAttached("TintColor", typeof(Color), typeof(ImageButtonTintEffectExtensions), default, propertyChanged: OnTintColorPropertyChanged);
    public static Color GetTintColor(BindableObject bindable)
    {
        return (Color)bindable.GetValue(TintColorProperty);
    }
    public static void SetTintColor(BindableObject bindable, Color value)
    {
        bindable.SetValue(TintColorProperty, value);
    }
    private static void OnTintColorPropertyChanged(BindableObject bindable, object oldValue, object newValue)
    {
    }
}

Of course, we want to set the TintColor property as Xamarin.Forms.Color as this will make it pretty easy to control the color from a Style or even a ViewModel.

We want our effect to only being invoked if we change the default TintColor value. This makes sure we are running only code that is necessary for our application:

private static void OnTintColorPropertyChanged(BindableObject bindable, object oldValue, object newValue)
{
    if (bindable is ImageButton current)
    {
        if ((Color)newValue != default)
        {
            if (!current.Effects.Any(e => e is ImageButtonTintEffect))
                current.Effects.Add(Effect.Resolve(nameof(ImageButtonTintEffect)));
        }
        else
        {
            if (current.Effects.Any(e => e is ImageButtonTintEffect))
            {
                var existingEffect = current.Effects.FirstOrDefault(e => e is ImageButtonTintEffect);
                current.Effects.Remove(existingEffect);
            }
        }
    }
}

Last but not least in our Xamarin.Forms application, we want to use the new Effect. This is pretty easy:

<!--import the namespace-->
xmlns:effects="clr-namespace:XfEffects.Effects"
<!--then use it like this-->
<ImageButton Margin="12,0,12,12"
    effects:ImageButtonTintEffectExtensions.TintColor="Red"
    BackgroundColor="Transparent"
    HeightRequest="48"
    HorizontalOptions="CenterAndExpand"
    Source="ic_refresh_white_24dp.png"
    WidthRequest="48">
    <ImageButton.Effects>
        <effects:ImageButtonTintEffect />
    </ImageButton.Effects>
</ImageButton>

We are using the attached property we created above to provide the TintColor to the ImageButtonTintEffect, which we need to add to the ImageButton‘s Effects List.

Android implementation

Let’s have a look at the Android-specific implementation. First, let’s add the platform class and decorate it with the proper attributes to export our effect:

using Android.Content.Res;
using Android.Graphics;
using System;
using System.ComponentModel;
using Xamarin.Forms;
using Xamarin.Forms.Platform.Android;
using AWImageButton = Android.Support.V7.Widget.AppCompatImageButton;
[assembly: ResolutionGroupName("XfEffects")]
[assembly: ExportEffect(typeof(XfEffects.Droid.Effects.ImageButtonTintEffect), nameof(XfEffects.Effects.ImageButtonTintEffect))]
namespace XfEffects.Droid.Effects
{
    public class ImageButtonTintEffect : PlatformEffect
    {
        protected override void OnAttached()
        {
            
        }
        protected override void OnDetached()
        {
        }
        protected override void OnElementPropertyChanged(PropertyChangedEventArgs args)
        {
        }
    }
}

Remember: the ResolutionGroupName needs to be defined just once per app and should not change. Similar to a custom Renderer, we also need to export the definition of the platform implementation and the Forms implementation to make our Effect working.

Android controls like buttons have different states. Properties on Android controls like the color can be set based on their State attribute. Xamarin.Android implements these states in the Android.Resource.Attribute class. We define our ImageButton‘s states like this:

static readonly int[][] _colorStates =
{
    new[] { global::Android.Resource.Attribute.StateEnabled },
    new[] { -global::Android.Resource.Attribute.StateEnabled }, //disabled state
    new[] { global::Android.Resource.Attribute.StatePressed } //pressed state
};

Good to know: certain states like ‘disabled‘ are created by just adding a ‘-‘ in front of the matching state defined in the OS states list (negating it). We need this declaration to create our own ColorStateList, which will override the color of the ImageButton‘s image. Add this method to the class created above:

private void UpdateTintColor()
{
    try
    {
        if (this.Control is AWImageButton imageButton)
        {
            var androidColor = XfEffects.Effects.ImageButtonTintEffectExtensions.GetTintColor(this.Element).ToAndroid();
            var disabledColor = androidColor;
            disabledColor.A = 0x1C; //140
            var pressedColor = androidColor;
            pressedColor.A = 0x24; //180
            imageButton.ImageTintList = new ColorStateList(_colorStates, new[] { androidColor.ToArgb(), disabledColor.ToArgb(), pressedColor.ToArgb() });
            imageButton.ImageTintMode = PorterDuff.Mode.SrcIn;
        }
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(
            $"An error occurred when setting the {typeof(XfEffects.Effects.ImageButtonTintEffect)} effect: {ex.Message}\n{ex.StackTrace}");
    }
}

This code works above the Android SDK 23, as only then the ability to modify the A-channel of the defined color was added. The Xamarin.Forms ImageButton translates into a AppCompatImageButton on Android. The AppCompatImageButton has the ImageTintList property. This property is of type ColorStatesList, which uses the states we defined earlier and the matching colors for those states.

Last but not least, we need to set the composition mode. If you want to get a deeper understanding of that, a great starting point is this StackOverflow question. To make things not too complicated, we are infusing the color into the image. The final step is to call the method in the OnAttached override as well as in the OnElementPropertyChanged override.

The result based on the sample I created looks like this:

iOS implementation

Of course, also on iOS, we have to attribute the class, similar to the Android version:

using System;
using System.ComponentModel;
using UIKit;
using Xamarin.Forms;
using Xamarin.Forms.Platform.iOS;
[assembly: ResolutionGroupName("XfEffects")]
[assembly: ExportEffect(typeof(XfEffects.iOS.Effects.ImageButtonTintEffect), nameof(XfEffects.Effects.ImageButtonTintEffect))]
namespace XfEffects.iOS.Effects
{
    public class ImageButtonTintEffect : PlatformEffect
    {
        protected override void OnAttached()
        {
        }
        protected override void OnDetached()
        {
        }
        protected override void OnElementPropertyChanged(PropertyChangedEventArgs args)
        {
        }
    }
}

The underlying control of the Xamarin.Forms ImageButton is a default UIButton on iOS. The UIButton control has an UIImageView, which can be changed with the SetImage method. Based on that knowledge, we are going to implement the UpdateTintColor method:

private void UpdateTintColor()
{
    try
    {
        if (this.Control is UIButton imagebutton)
        {
            if (imagebutton.ImageView?.Image != null)
            {
                var templatedImg = imagebutton.CurrentImage.ImageWithRenderingMode(UIImageRenderingMode.AlwaysTemplate);
                //clear the image on the button
                imagebutton.SetImage(null, UIControlState.Normal);
                imagebutton.ImageView.TintColor = XfEffects.Effects.ImageButtonTintEffectExtensions.GetTintColor(this.Element).ToUIColor();
                imagebutton.TintColor = XfEffects.Effects.ImageButtonTintEffectExtensions.GetTintColor(this.Element).ToUIColor();
                imagebutton.SetImage(templatedImg, UIControlState.Normal);
            }
        }
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine($"An error occurred when setting the {typeof(ImageButtonTintEffect)} effect: {ex.Message}\n{ex.StackTrace}");
    }
}

Let’s review these code lines. The first step is to extract the already attached Image as a templated Image from the UIButton‘s UIImageView. The second step is to clear the Image from the Button, using the SetImage method and passing null as UIImage parameter. I tried to leave out this step, but it does not work if you do so.

The next step changes the TintColor for the UIButton‘s UIImageView as well as for the button itself. I was only able to get the TintColor changed once I changed both TintColor properties.

The final step is to re-attach the extracted image from step one to the UIImageButton‘s UIImageView, using once again the SetImage method – but this time, we are passing the extracted image as UIImage parameter.

Of course, also here we need to call this method in the OnAttached override as well as in OnElementPropertyChanged.

The result should look similar to this one:

Conclusion

It is pretty easy to implement extended functionality with a Xamarin.Forms Effect. The process is similar to the one of creating a custom renderer. By using attached properties you can fine-tune the usage of this code and also pass property values to the platform implementations.

Please make sure to follow along for the other Effects I will post as part of this new series. I also created a sample app to demonstrate the Effects (find it on Github). As always, I hope this post will be helpful for some of you.

Until the next post, happy coding, everyone!
Posted by msicc in Android, Dev Stories, iOS, Xamarin, 0 comments
05
Feb
2019
Use NuGets for your common Xamarin (Forms) code (and automate the creation process)

Use NuGets for your common Xamarin (Forms) code (and automate the creation process)

Internal libraries

Writing (or copy and pasting) the same code over and over again is one of those things I try to avoid when writing code. For quite some time, I already organize such code in libraries. Until last year, this required quite some work managing all libraries for each Xamarin platform I used. Luckily, the MSBuild SDK Extras extensions showed up and made everything a whole lot easier, especially after James Montemagno did a detailed explanation on how to get the most out of it for Xamarin plugins/libraries.

Getting started

Even if I repeat some of the steps of James’ post, I’ll start from scratch on the setup part here. I hope to make the whole process straight forward for everyone – that’s why I think it makes sense to show each and every step. Please make sure you are using the new .csproj type. If you need a refresh on that, you can check my post about migrating to it (if needed).

MSBuild.Sdk.Extras

The first step is pulling in MSBuild.Sdk.Extras, which will enable us to target multiple platforms in one single library. For this, we need a global.json file in the solution folder. Right click on the solution name and select ‘Open Folder in File Explorer‘, then just add a new text file and name it appropriately.

The next step is to define the version of the MSBuild.SDK.Extras library we want to use. The current version is 1.6.65, so let’s define it in the file. Just click the ‘Solution and Folders‘ button to find the file in Visual Studio:

switch to folder view

Add these lines into the file and save it:

{
  "msbuild-sdks": {
    "MSBuild.Sdk.Extras": "1.6.65"
  }
}

Modifying the project file

Switch back to the Solution view and right click on the .csproj file. Select ‘Edit [ProjectName].csproj‘. Let’s modify and add the project definitions. We’ll start right in the first line. Replace the first line to pull in the MSBuild.Sdk.Extras:

<Project Sdk="MSBuild.Sdk.Extras">

Next, we’re separating the Version tag. This will ensure that we’ll find it very quickly in future within the file:

  <!--separated for accessibility-->
  <PropertyGroup>
    <Version>1.0.0.0</Version>
  </PropertyGroup>

Now we are enabling multiple targets, in this case our Xamarin platforms. Please note that there are two separated versions – one that includes UWP and one that does not. I thought I would be fine to remove the non-UWP one if I include UWP and was precent with some strange build errors that where resolved only by re-adding the deleted line. I do not remember the reason, but I made a comment in my template to not remove it – so let’s just keep it that way.

  <!--make it multi-platform library!-->
  <PropertyGroup>
    <UseFullSemVerForNuGet>false</UseFullSemVerForNuGet>
    <!--we are handling compile items ourselves below with a custom naming scheme-->
    <EnableDefaultCompileItems>false</EnableDefaultCompileItems>
    <KEEP ALL THREE IF YOU ADD UWP!-->
    <TargetFrameworks></TargetFrameworks>
    <TargetFrameworks Condition=" '$(OS)' == 'Windows_NT' ">netstandard2.0;MonoAndroid81;Xamarin.iOS10;uap10.0.16299;</TargetFrameworks>
    <TargetFrameworks Condition=" '$(OS)' != 'Windows_NT' ">netstandard2.0;MonoAndroid81;Xamarin.iOS10;</TargetFrameworks>
  </PropertyGroup>

Now we will add some default NuGet packages into the project and make sure our file get included only on the correct platform. We follow a simple file naming scheme (Xamarin.Essentials uses the same):

[Class].[platform].cs

This way, we are able to add all platform specific code together with the shared entry point in a single folder. Let’ start with shared items. These will be available on all platforms listed in the PropertyGroup above:

  <!--shared items-->
  <ItemGroup>
    <!--keeping this one ensures everything goes smooth-->
    <PackageReference Include="MSBuild.Sdk.Extras" Version="1.6.65" PrivateAssets="All" />

    <!--most commonly used (by me)-->
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Forms" Version="3.4.0.1029999" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Essentials" Version="1.0.1" />

    <!--include content, exclude obj and bin folders-->
    <None Include="**\*.cs;**\*.xml;**\*.axml;**\*.png;**\*.xaml" Exclude="obj\**\*.*;bin\**\*.*;bin;obj" />
    <Compile Include="**\*.shared.cs" />
  </ItemGroup>

The ‘**\‘ part in the Include property of the Compile tag ensures MSBuild includes also classes in subfolders. Now let’s add some platform specific rules to the project:

  <ItemGroup Condition=" $(TargetFramework.StartsWith('netstandard')) ">
    <Compile Include="**\*.netstandard.cs" />
  </ItemGroup>

  <ItemGroup Condition=" $(TargetFramework.StartsWith('uap10.0')) ">
    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.NETCore.UniversalWindowsPlatform" Version="6.1.9" />
    <Compile Include="**\*.uwp.cs" />
  </ItemGroup>

  <ItemGroup Condition=" $(TargetFramework.StartsWith('MonoAndroid')) ">
    <!--need to reference all those libs to get latest minimum Android SDK version (requirement by Google)... #sigh-->
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.Annotations" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.Compat" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.Core.Utils" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.CustomTabs" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.v4" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.Design" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.v7.AppCompat" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.v7.CardView" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.v7.Palette" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.v7.MediaRouter" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.Core.UI" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.Fragment" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.Media.Compat" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.v7.RecyclerView" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.Transition" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.Vector.Drawable" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <PackageReference Include="Xamarin.Android.Support.Vector.Drawable" Version="28.0.0.1" />
    <Compile Include="**\*.android.cs" />
  </ItemGroup>

  <ItemGroup Condition=" $(TargetFramework.StartsWith('Xamarin.iOS')) ">
    <Compile Include="**\*.ios.cs" />
  </ItemGroup>

Two side notes:

  • Do not reference version 6.2.2 of the Microsoft.NETCore.UniversalWindowsPlatform NuGet. There seems to be bug in there that will lead to rejection of your app from the Microsoft Store. Just keep 6.1.9 (for the moment).
  • You may not need all of the Xamarin.Android packages, but there are a bunch of dependencies between them and others, so I decided to keep them all

If you have followed along, hit the save button and close the .csproj file. Verifying everything went well is pretty easy – your solution structure should look like this:

multi-targeting-project

Before we’ll have a look at the NuGet creation part of this post, let’s add some sample code. Just insert this into static partial classes with the appropriate naming scheme for every platform and edit the code to match the platform. The .shared version of this should be empty (for this sample). 

     public static partial class Hello
    {
        public static string Name { get; set; }

        public static string Platform { get; set; }

        public static  void Print()
        {
            if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(Name) && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(Platform))
                System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine($"Hello {Name} from {Platform}");
            else
                System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine($"Hello unkown person from {Device.Android}");
        }
    }

Normally, this would be a Renderer or other platform specific code. You should get the idea.

Preparing NuGet package creation

We will now prepare our solution to automatically generate NuGet packages both for DEBUG and RELEASE configurations. Once the packages are created, we will push it to a local (or network) file folder, which serves as our local NuGet-Server. This will fit for most Indie-developers – which tend to not replicate a full blown enterprise infrastructure for their DevOps needs. I will also mention how you could push the packages to an internal NuGet server on a sideline (we are using a similar setup at work).

Adding NuGet Push configurations

One thing we want to make sure is that we are not going to push packages on every compilation of our library. That’s why we need to separate configurations. To add new configurations, open the Configuration Manager in Visual Studio:

In the Configuration Manager dialog, select the ‘<New…>‘ option from the ‘Active solution configuration‘ ComboBox:

Name the new config to fit your needs, I just use DebugNuget which will signal that we are pushing the NuGet package for distribution. I am copying the settings from the Debug configuration and let Visual Studio add the configurations to project files within the solution. Repeat the same for Release configuration.

The result should look like this:

Modifying the project file (again)

If you head over to your project file, you will see the Configurations tag has new entries:

  <PropertyGroup>
    <Configurations>Debug;Release;DebugNuget;ReleaseNuget</Configurations>
  </PropertyGroup>

Next, add the properties of your assembly and package:

    <!--assmebly properties-->
  <PropertyGroup>
    <AssemblyName>XamarinNugets</AssemblyName>
    <RootNamespace>XamarinNugets</RootNamespace>
    <Product>XamarinNugets</Product>
    <AssemblyVersion>$(Version)</AssemblyVersion>
    <AssemblyFileVersion>$(Version)</AssemblyFileVersion>
    <NeutralLanguage>en</NeutralLanguage>
    <LangVersion>7.1</LangVersion>
  </PropertyGroup>

  <!--nuget package properties-->
  <PropertyGroup>
    <PackageId>XamarinNugets</PackageId>
    <PackageLicenseUrl>https://github.com/MSiccDevXamarinNugets</PackageLicenseUrl>
    <PackageProjectUrl>https://github.com/MSiccDevXamarinNugets</PackageProjectUrl>
    <RepositoryUrl>https://github.com/MSiccDevXamarinNugets</RepositoryUrl>

    <PackageReleaseNotes>Xamarin Nugets sample package</PackageReleaseNotes>
    <PackageTags>xamarin, windows, ios, android, xamarin.forms, plugin</PackageTags>

    <Title>Xamarin Nugets</Title>
    <Summary>Xamarin Nugets sample package</Summary>
    <Description>Xamarin Nugets sample package</Description>

    <Owners>MSiccDev Software Development</Owners>
    <Authors>MSiccDev Software Development</Authors>
    <Copyright>MSiccDev Software Development</Copyright>
  </PropertyGroup>

Configuration specific properties

Now we will add some configuration specific PropertyGroups that control if a package will be created.

Debug and DebugNuget

  <PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(Configuration)'=='Debug' ">
    <DefineConstants>DEBUG</DefineConstants>
    <!--making this pre-release-->
    <PackageVersion>$(Version)-pre</PackageVersion>
    <!--needed for debugging!-->
    <DebugType>full</DebugType>
    <DebugSymbols>true</DebugSymbols>
  </PropertyGroup>

  <PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(Configuration)'=='DebugNuget' ">
    <DefineConstants>DEBUG</DefineConstants>
    <!--enable package creation-->
    <GeneratePackageOnBuild>true</GeneratePackageOnBuild>
    <!--making this pre-release-->
    <PackageVersion>$(Version)-pre</PackageVersion>
    <!--needed for debugging!-->
    <DebugType>full</DebugType>
    <DebugSymbols>true</DebugSymbols>
    <GenerateDocumentationFile>false</GenerateDocumentationFile>
    <!--this makes msbuild creating src folder inside the symbols package-->
    <IncludeSource>True</IncludeSource>
    <IncludeSymbols>True</IncludeSymbols>
  </PropertyGroup>

The Debug configuration enables us to step into the Debug code while we are referencing the project directly during development, while the DebugNuget configuration will also generate a NuGet package including Source and Symbols. This is helpful once you find a bug in the NuGet package and allows us to step into this code also if we reference the NuGet instead of the project. Both configurations will add ‘-pre‘ to the version, making these packages only appear if you tick the ‘Include prerelease‘ CheckBox in the NuGet Package Manager.

Release and ReleaseNuget

  <PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(Configuration)'=='Release' ">
    <DefineConstants>RELEASE</DefineConstants>
    <PackageVersion>$(Version)</PackageVersion>
  </PropertyGroup>

  <PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(Configuration)'=='ReleaseNuget' ">
    <DefineConstants>RELEASE</DefineConstants>
    <PackageVersion>$(Version)</PackageVersion>
    <!--enable package creation-->
    <GeneratePackageOnBuild>true</GeneratePackageOnBuild>
    <!--include pdb for analytic services-->
    <DebugType>pdbonly</DebugType>
    <GenerateDocumentationFile>true</GenerateDocumentationFile>
  </PropertyGroup>

The relase configuration goes well with less settings. We do not generate a separated symbols-package here, as the .pdb-file without the source will do well in most cases.

Adding Build Targets

We are close to finish our implementation already. Of course, we want to make sure we push only the latest packages. To ensure this, we are cleaning all generated NuGet packages before we build the project/solution:

  <!--cleaning older nugets-->
  <Target Name="CleanOldNupkg" BeforeTargets="Build">
    <ItemGroup>
      <FilesToDelete Include="$(ProjectDir)$(BaseOutputPath)$(Configuration)\$(AssemblyName).*.nupkg"></FilesToDelete>
    </ItemGroup>
    <Delete Files="@(FilesToDelete)" />
    <Message Text="Old nupkg in $(ProjectDir)$(BaseOutputPath)$(Configuration) deleted." Importance="High"></Message>
  </Target>

MSBuild provides a lot of options to configure. We are setting the BeforeTargets property of the target to Build, so once we Clean/Build/Rebuild, all old packages will be deleted by the Delete command. Finally, we are printing a message to confirm the deletion.

Pushing the packages

After completing all these steps above, we are ready to distribute our packages. In our case, we are copying the packages to a local folder with the Copy command. 

  <!--pushing to local folder (or network path)-->
  <Target Name="PushDebug" AfterTargets="Pack" Condition="'$(Configuration)'=='DebugNuget'">
    <ItemGroup>
      <PackageToCopy Include="$(ProjectDir)$(BaseOutputPath)$(Configuration)\$(AssemblyName).*.symbols.nupkg"></PackageToCopy>
    </ItemGroup>
    <Copy SourceFiles="@(PackageToCopy)" DestinationFolder="C:\TempLocNuget" />
    <Message Text="Copied '@(PackageToCopy)' to local Nuget folder" Importance="High"></Message>
  </Target>

  <Target Name="PushRelease" AfterTargets="Pack" Condition="'$(Configuration)'=='ReleaseNuget'">
    <ItemGroup>
      <PackageToCopy Include="$(ProjectDir)$(BaseOutputPath)$(Configuration)\$(AssemblyName).*.nupkg"></PackageToCopy>
    </ItemGroup>
    <Copy SourceFiles="@(PackageToCopy)" DestinationFolder="C:\TempLocNuget" />
    <Message Text="Copied '@(PackageToCopy)' to local Nuget folder" Importance="High"></Message>
  </Target>

Please note that the local folder could be replaced by a network path. You have to ensure the availability of that path – which adds in some additional work if you choose this route.

If you’re running a full NuGet server (as often happens in Enterprise environments), you can push the packages with this command (instead of the Copy command):

<Exec Command="NuGet push "$(ProjectDir)$(BaseOutputPath)$(Configuration)\$(AssemblyName).*.symbols.nupkg" [YourPublishKey] -Source [YourNugetServerUrl]" />

The result

If we now select the DebugNuget/ReleaseNuget configuration, Visual Studio will create our NuGet package and push it to our Nuget folder/server:

Let’s have a look into the NuGet package as well. Open your file location defined above and search your package:

As you can see, the Copy command executed successfully. To inspect NuGet packages, you need the NuGet Package Explorer app. Once installed, just double click the package to view its contents. Your result should be similar to this for the DebugNuGet package:

As you can see, we have both the .pdb files as well as the source in our package as intended.

Conclusion

Even as an Indie developer, you can take advantage of the DevOps options provided with Visual Studio and MSBuild. The MSBuild.Sdk.Extras package enables us to maintain a multi-targeting package for our Xamarin(.Forms) code. The whole process needs some setup, but once you have performed the steps above, extending your libraries is just fast forward.

I planned to write this post for quite some time, and I am happy with doing it as my contribution to the #XamarinMonth (initiated by Luis Matos). As always, I hope this post is helpful for some of you. Feel free to clone and play with the full sample I uploaded on Github.

Until the next post, happy coding, everyone!

Helpful links:

Title image credit

P.S. Feel free to download the official app for my blog (that uses a lot of what I am blogging about):
iOS | Android | Windows 10

Posted by msicc in Azure, Dev Stories, iOS, UWP, Xamarin, 3 comments
09
Aug
2018
A faster way to add image assets to your Xamarin.iOS project in Visual Studio 2017

A faster way to add image assets to your Xamarin.iOS project in Visual Studio 2017

While Visual Studio has an editor that shall help to add new image assets to the project, it is pretty slow when adding a bunch of new images. If you have to add a lot of images to add, it even crashes once in while, which can be annoying. Because I was in the process of adding more than a hundred images for porting my first app ever from Windows Phone to iOS and Android, I searched for a faster way – and found it.

What’s going on under the hood?

When you add an imageset to your assets structure, Visual Studio does quite some work. These are the steps that are done:

  1. creation of a folder for the imageset in the Assets folder
  2. creation of a Contents.jsonfile
  3. modification of the Contents.json file
  4. modification of the .csproj file

This takes some time for every image, and Visual Studio seems to be quite busy with these steps. After analyzing the way imagesets get added, I immediately recognized that I am faster than Visual Studio if I do that work manually.

How to add the assets – step by step

  1. right click on the project in Solution Explorer and select ‘Open Folder in File Explorer‘ and find the ‘Assets‘ folder  open_folder_in_file_explorer
  2. create a new folder in this format: ‘[yourassetname].imageset‘
  3. add your image to the folder
  4. create a new file with the name Contents.json   add_image_and_contents_file
  5. open the file (I use Notepad++ for such operations) and add this minimum required jsonto it: 
    {
  "images": [
    {
      "scale": "1x",
      "idiom": "universal",
      "filename": "[yourimage].png"
    },
    {
      "scale": "2x",
      "idiom": "universal",
      "filename": "[yourimage].png"
    },
    {
      "scale": "3x",
      "idiom": "universal",
      "filename": "[yourimage].png"
    },
    {
      "idiom": "universal"
    }
  ],
  "properties": {
    "template-rendering-intent": ""
  },
  "info": {
    "version": 1,
    "author": ""
  }
}
  6. go back to Visual Studio, right click on the project again and select ‘Unload Project‘unload_project
  7. right click again and select ‘Edit [yourprojectname].iOS.csproj‘ edit_ios_csproj
  8. find the ItemGroup with the Assets
  9. inside the ItemGroup, add your imageset with these two entries: 
    <ImageAsset Include="Assets.xcassets\[yourassetname].imageset\[yourimage].png">
  <Visible>false</Visible>
</ImageAsset>
<ImageAsset Include="Assets.xcassets\[yourassetname].imageset\Contents.json">
  <Visible>false</Visible>
</ImageAsset>
  10. close the file and reload the project by selecting it from the context menu in Solution Explorer

If you followed this steps, your assets should be visible immediately:
assets_with_added_imagesets

I did not measure the time exactly, but I felt I was significantly faster by adding all those images that way. Your mileage may vary, depending on the power of your dev machine.

Conclusion

Features like the AssetManager for iOS in Visual Studio are nice to have, but some have some serious performance problems (most of them are already known). By taking over the process manually, one can be a lot faster than a built-in feature. That said, like always, I hope this post is helpful for some of you.

Happy coding, everyone!

Posted by msicc in Dev Stories, iOS, Xamarin, 1 comment
06
Jul
2018
Xamarin Forms, the MVVMLight Toolkit and I: Command Chaining

Xamarin Forms, the MVVMLight Toolkit and I: Command Chaining

The problem

Sometimes, we want to invoke a method that is available via code for a control. Due to the abstraction of our MVVM application, the ViewModel has no access to all those methods that are available if we would access the control via code. There are several approaches to solve this problem. In one of my recent projects, I needed to invoke a method of a custom control, which should be routed into the platform renderers I wrote for such a custom control. I remembered that I have indeed read quite a few times about command chaining for such cases and tried to implement it. In the beginning, it may sound weird to do this, but the more often I see this technique, the more I like it.

Simple Demo control

For demo purposes, I created this really simple Xamarin.Forms user control:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ContentView xmlns="http://xamarin.com/schemas/2014/forms" 
             xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2009/xaml"
             x:Class="XfMvvmLight.Controls.CommandChainingDemoControl">
  <ContentView.Content>
      <StackLayout HorizontalOptions="FillAndExpand" VerticalOptions="FillAndExpand">
            <Label x:Name="LabelFilledFromBehind" Margin="12" FontSize="Large" />   
        </StackLayout>
  </ContentView.Content>
</ContentView>

As you can see, there is just a label without text. We will write the necessary code to fill this label with some text just by invoking a method in the code behind. To be able to do so, we need a BindableProperty (once again) to get our foot into the door of the control:

public static BindableProperty DemoCommandProperty = BindableProperty.Create(nameof(DemoCommand), typeof(ICommand), typeof(CommandChainingDemoControl), null, BindingMode.OneWayToSource);

public ICommand DemoCommand
{
    get => (ICommand)GetValue(DemoCommandProperty);
    set => SetValue(DemoCommandProperty, value);
}

The implementation is pretty straightforward. We have done this already during this series, so you should be familiar if you were following. One thing, however, is different. For this BindableProperty, we are using BindingMode.OneWayToSource. By doing so, we are basically making it a read-only property, which sends its changes only down to the ViewModel (the source). If we would not do this, the ViewModel could change the property, which we do not want here.

Now we have the BindableProperty in place, we need to create an instance of the Command that will be sent down to the ViewModel. We are doing this as soon as the control is instantiated in the constructor:

public CommandChainingDemoControl()
      {
          InitializeComponent();

          this.DemoCommand = new Command(() =>
          {
              FillFromBehind();
          });
      }

      private void FillFromBehind()
      {
          this.LabelFilledFromBehind.Text = "Text was empty, but we used command chaining to show this text inside a control.";
      }

That’s all we need to do in the code behind.

ViewModel

For this demo, I created a new page and a corresponding ViewModel in the demo project. Here is the very basic ViewModel code:

using System.Windows.Input;
using GalaSoft.MvvmLight.Command;

namespace XfMvvmLight.ViewModel
{
    public class CommandChainingDemoViewModel : XfNavViewModelBase
    {
        private ICommand _invokeDemoCommand;
        private RelayCommand _demo1Command;

        public CommandChainingDemoViewModel()
        {
        }

        public ICommand InvokeDemoCommand { get => _invokeDemoCommand; set => Set(ref _invokeDemoCommand, value); }

        public RelayCommand Demo1Command => _demo1Command ?? (_demo1Command = new RelayCommand(() =>
        {
            this.InvokeDemoCommand?.Execute(null);
        }));
    }
}

As you can see, the ViewModel includes two Commands. One is the pure ICommand implementation that gets its value from the OneWayToSource-Binding. We are not using MVVMLight’s RelayCommand here to avoid casting between types, which always led to an exception when I tested the implementation first. The second command is bound to a button in the CommandChainingDemoPage and will be the trigger to execute the InvokeDemoCommand.

Final steps

The final steps are just a few simple ones. We need to connect the  InvokeDemoCommand to the user control we created earlier, while we need to bind the Demo1Commandto the corresponding button in the view. This is the page’s code after doing so:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<baseCtrl:XfNavContentPage
    xmlns:baseCtrl="clr-namespace:XfMvvmLight.BaseControls" xmlns="http://xamarin.com/schemas/2014/forms"
             xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2009/xaml"
             xmlns:ctrl="clr-namespace:XfMvvmLight.Controls;assembly=XfMvvmLight"
             x:Class="XfMvvmLight.View.CommandChainingDemoPage" RegisteredPageKey="{Binding CommandChainingDemoPageKey, Source=Locator}">
    <ContentPage.BindingContext>
        <Binding Path="CommandChainingDemoVm" Source="{StaticResource Locator}" />
    </ContentPage.BindingContext>

    <Grid>
        <Grid.RowDefinitions>
            <RowDefinition Height="*"/>
            <RowDefinition Height="Auto"/>
        </Grid.RowDefinitions>

        <ctrl:CommandChainingDemoControl Grid.Row="0" DemoCommand="{Binding InvokeDemoCommand, Mode=OneWayToSource}" Margin="12"></ctrl:CommandChainingDemoControl>

        <Button Text="Execute Command Chaining" Command="{Binding Demo1Command}" Margin="12" Grid.Row="1" />

    </Grid>
</baseCtrl:XfNavContentPage>

One thing to point out is that we are also specifying the OneWayToSource binding here once again. It should work with normal binding, but it I recommend to do like I did, which makes the code easier to understand for others (and of course yourself). That’s all – we have now a working command chain that invokes a method inside the user control from our ViewModel.

Conclusion

Command chaining can be a convenient way to invoke actions on controls that are otherwise not possible due to the abstraction of layers in MVVM. Once you got the concept, they are pretty easy to implement. This technique is also usable outside of Xamarin.Forms, so do not hesitate to use it out there. Just remember the needed steps:

  • create a user control (or a derived one if you need to call a method on framework controls)
  • add a BindableProperty/DependecyProperty and set its default binding mode to OneWayToSource
  • instantiate the BindableProperty/DependecyProperty inside the constructor of the user control
  • pass the method call/code into the Action part of the newly created Command  instance
  • create the commands in the ViewModel
  • connect the Commands to your final view implementation

Like I wrote earlier, I came across this (again) when I was writing a custom Xamarin.Forms control with renderers, where I had to invoke methods inside the renderer from my ViewModel. Other techniques that I saw to solve this is using Messengers (be it the one from MVVMLight or the Xamarin.Forms Messenger implementation) or the good old Boolean switch implementation (uses also a BindableProperty/DependecyProperty). I decided to use the command chaining approach as it is pretty elegant in my eyes and not that complicated to implement.

The series’ sample project is updated and available here on Github. Like always, I hope this post is useful for some of you.

Happy coding, everyone!

all articles of this series

title image credit

Posted by msicc in Android, Dev Stories, iOS, UWP, Xamarin, 7 comments